3d printing service
Custom 3D Printing Services
Upload your drawing (STEP, IGES, DWG, DXF, PDF) — we return DFM feedback and a quote within 24 hours.
- Tolerance
- Confirmed per process and part
- MOQ
- From 1 piece
- Lead time
- Quoted per part
- Materials
- Nylon PA 2200 · TPU · AlSi10Mg · engineering plastics
- Documents
- Pre-shipment photos with every order
What 3D printing is for
Additive manufacturing builds a part by adding material layer by layer rather than removing it from a block. That single difference is what makes it useful: there is no tool to reach into the part, no cutter radius to leave behind, and no tooling to pay for before the first piece exists.
The three situations where that matters most are worth stating plainly.
The geometry cannot be machined economically. Internal channels that curve, lattice structures, hollow sections with no access, parts that would need to be made in several pieces and joined. A cutting tool has to be able to reach the surface it is cutting; an additive process does not.
The quantity is too small to justify tooling. A single part, or five, or twenty. There is no die to cut and no fixture to build, so the first part costs the same as the hundredth — which is the opposite of how casting and moulding behave.
The design is still moving. Where a part may change next week, a route with no tooling is a route you can change next week too.
The honest corollary is that 3D printing is not a replacement for machining. Where a part has to hold a tight tolerance, take a machined surface finish, or be produced in any real quantity, machining is still the faster and cheaper answer. The two processes do different jobs, and the interesting question is usually which half of a job belongs to each.
The processes we arrange
Additive covers a family of processes rather than one, and they differ in how the layers are formed, what materials they accept and what the resulting part can do.
| Process | How it works | Suits |
|---|---|---|
| SLA | A laser cures liquid resin layer by layer | Fine detail, smooth surfaces, visual models |
| SLS | A laser sinters powder, layer by layer | Functional nylon parts, no support structures needed |
| MJF | Powder is fused by an agent and heat | Functional nylon parts, good consistency across a build |
| FDM | Thermoplastic filament is extruded | Simple parts, large sizes, quick checks |
| Metal printing | Metal powder fused by laser | Metal parts with geometry that cannot be machined |
The distinction that matters most to a buyer is between resin processes and powder processes. Resin gives a finer surface and better detail, and is usually the choice for a visual model. Powder-based nylon gives a part that behaves like a part — it can be snapped, loaded, threaded and used — which is what most functional prototypes need.
Work is arranged through our vetted partner network and managed as one job with any machining that follows, rather than being handed off as a separate errand. The materials page lists the grades we run across all processes.
Materials
We name only the grades we have confirmed we can supply.
| Material | Process | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| Nylon PA 2200 | SLS / MJF | Functional prototypes, brackets, housings, living hinges |
| TPU | Powder and filament processes | Flexible parts, grips, seals, impact covers |
| Aluminium AlSi10Mg | Metal printing | Lightweight metal parts with geometry that machining cannot reach |
| Engineering plastics | Per process | See the materials page for the full confirmed range |
Where a drawing calls for a grade outside that list, the right move is to say what the part has to do rather than to assume a substitution. Additive material properties vary more between suppliers than machined metal does, and confirming availability before quoting is better than discovering it afterwards.
Tolerance, and where printing stops
Additive processes build in layers, and that shapes what they can achieve. Layer thickness, thermal shrinkage, support removal and the orientation of the part in the build all affect the result, and the achievable tolerance is looser than a cutting process can hold.
The practical guidance:
- Treat the printed form as the shape, not the accuracy. Where a feature has to be exact, it is machined afterwards.
- Orientation affects more than the surface. A part printed in one orientation can differ measurably from the same part printed in another, in strength as well as finish.
- Small features and thin walls have process limits. What is achievable depends on the process, so confirm on the drawing rather than assuming.
Where a printed part needs accuracy, the hybrid route solves it: print near-net, then machine the critical features on our floor to ±0.01 mm with ISO 2768-m as the general tolerance block. Bores, sealing faces, threads and locating diameters all benefit — see tolerances we hold for what the machining stage delivers.
Design rules that change the price
Additive design is different from machined design, and a part designed for one is rarely efficient in the other.
Wall thickness. Every process has a minimum, and it is thicker than a machined wall can be. Very thin walls may print but not reliably, and the failure is not always visible.
Support structures. Some processes need supports under overhangs, which have to be removed afterwards and leave a mark. Others work in a powder bed that supports the part itself, which is why SLS and MJF handle complex geometry so well.
Trapped material. Hollow sections and internal channels have to let unused powder or resin out. A closed cavity is a cavity you cannot empty, and a sealed void inside a part is a problem waiting to appear.
Orientation. The build direction decides where layer lines run, which affects both the appearance and the strength of the part. A feature that loads across the layers behaves differently from one that loads along them.
Threads. Printed threads are possible but weaker than cut threads, and where a thread has to take load the answer is usually to print a pilot and cut the thread afterwards.
None of this is a reason to avoid the process. It is the set of decisions that turn a printable model into a good printed part, and raising them at the enquiry costs nothing.
Documents and shipping
Every order ships with pre-shipment photos of the actual parts before dispatch. Where the additive supplier issues a material certificate, that ships with the batch as well.
For the machining stage of a hybrid route, the same documents apply as for any machined part: a material certificate (MTR) traceable to the mill heat, plus the pre-shipment photos. What ships with an order is set out on the quality documents page.
Orders for printed parts have no minimum quantity. Where a project moves from a printed prototype into machined production, orders for the machined stage start at 50 pieces per style and material, with samples from a single piece in 5–10 days and production in 25–35 days after sample approval.
How to start
Send the model or drawing, the quantity, and what the part has to do — whether it is a fit check, a functional test, a display model or a production component. The reply comes back within 24 hours with DFM feedback that says which process suits it, what the achievable tolerance is, and whether a hybrid route of print-then-machine would give a better part for the same money.
Specifications
| Process | SLA, SLS, MJF, FDM and metal printing, arranged through our vetted partner network |
|---|---|
| Confirmed materials | Nylon PA 2200, TPU, aluminium AlSi10Mg, engineering plastics |
| Minimum quantity | From 1 piece — 3D printing has no tooling |
| Tolerance | Confirmed per process and part; looser than CNC machining |
| Surface as printed | Layer texture; finishing available on request |
| Post-processing | Support removal, bead blasting, dyeing, machining of critical features |
| Combination route | Print near-net, then machine critical features on our floor |
| Machined tolerance | ±0.01 mm on features machined after printing |
| Quote turnaround | Within 24 hours with DFM feedback |
| Documents | Material certificate where the supplier issues one, plus pre-shipment photos |
Frequently asked questions
When should a part be 3D printed rather than machined?
When the geometry cannot be machined economically, when the quantity is too small to justify tooling, or when the part is needed before a machining route could be set up. 3D printing has no tooling cost, so it is at its best on one-offs, on parts with internal channels or lattice structures that a cutter cannot reach, and on early prototypes where the design is still moving. Where a part has to hold a tight tolerance or a machined surface finish, machining is still the right process.
Is a 3D printed part as accurate as a machined part?
No, and it is worth being clear about that. Additive processes build a part layer by layer, so the achievable tolerance and surface finish are both looser than a cutting process. Precision features are held to ±0.01 mm on parts we machine. Where a printed part needs an accurate bore, a sealing face or a thread, the usual answer is to print it near-net and then machine those specific features.
Can you print and then machine the same part?
Yes, and it is a common route. The part is printed close to shape, then the critical features — bores, sealing faces, threads, locating diameters — are machined on our floor to ±0.01 mm with ISO 2768-m as the general tolerance block. That gets the geometry that additive is good at and the accuracy that machining is good at, in one job rather than two suppliers.
What materials can you print?
The confirmed range covers nylon PA 2200, TPU and aluminium AlSi10Mg, along with the engineering plastics in our standard range. Where a drawing calls for a grade outside that list, tell us what the part has to do and we will confirm what is available rather than assume. We list only what we have confirmed we can supply.
Is there a minimum order quantity for 3D printing?
No — there is no tooling, so a single part is a normal order. That is one of the reasons additive is used for early prototypes: you can hold the geometry in your hand before committing to a machining route or a mould. Orders for machined parts start at 50 pieces per style and material, but 3D printing has no such floor.
How do you finish a 3D printed part?
Support removal is part of the process. Beyond that, bead blasting evens the surface, dyeing gives colour on suitable nylons, and machining handles any feature that has to be accurate. Where the part will be seen, the layer texture is a design decision rather than a defect — say at the enquiry whether the finish matters and the orientation can be planned around it.
What does 3D printing cost compared with machining?
It depends almost entirely on quantity and geometry. On a single complex part, printing is often cheaper because there is no setup and no tooling, and because it can produce geometry that would need several machining operations. On a simple part at any volume, machining is faster and cheaper per piece. The comparison is per part, not per process.
Can you help decide between printing and machining?
Yes, and it comes back with the quotation. Send the drawing or model with the quantity and what the part has to do, and the DFM feedback will say which route suits it and why — including where a hybrid route of printing near-net and machining the critical features would be the better answer.
Send your drawing — quote in 24 hours
DFM feedback, material certificates and pre-shipment photos come with every order.